Sunday, December 12, 2010

1963, February 11: Back-Story, Part 1



(above) prototype cover used for early advertisement

The journey to super-stardom continued, still in the middle echelons. With “Please Please Me” released, but not yet at Number One, and in the midst of a bus tour with Helen Shapiro (who topped the bill), the Fab Four entered Abbey Road Studios on February 11, 1963 to lay down new tracks for the forthcoming debut LP. In fact, they would record ten superb songs in just under ten hours, a tribute to the industrious nature and overflowing talent of our heroes (although Lewisohn states that it was common in 1963 for pop bands to record an entire album in a single day, he like we recognize the superiority of this particular effort). And, without hesitation, they resumed the Shapiro tour the next day.

RELATIVES:
Get an overview of Helen Shapiro: here. Many Shapiro videos are on YouTube.

_______________________________________________________________________

"THERE'S A PLACE"

This song was recorded first, possibly reflecting its importance in the minds of the fellows. We can make this assumption since it was unusual for its time, the title phrase meaning “the place was in the mind, rather than round the back of the stairs for a kiss and a cuddle. This was the difference with what we were writing, we were getting a bit more cerebral”1. It was co-written by John and Paul at the McCartney homestead on Forthlin Road, in January (or possibly February 3 or 4) 1963. John said it was mostly his, with a trademark stamp: “‘There's A Place’ was my attempt at a sort of Motown, black thing. It says the usual Lennon things: ‘In my mind there's no sorrow'... It's all in your mind”2. The title derived from Leonard Bernstein’s “Somewhere” (the opening lyric for which is “there’s a place for us”) from the West Side Story soundtrack album, which Paul owned.

1 Miles, Many Years From Now, p.95
2 Sheff, All We Are Saying, p.193

_______________________________________________________________________

"I SAW HER STANDING THERE"

This rouser was next, a song they had been perfecting for at least six months. It was co-written1, but John said that he only “helped with a couple of the lyrics”2, to which Paul concurred that it was “my original. I'd started it and I had the first verse, which therefore gave me the tune, the tempo and the key. It gave you the subject matter, a lot of information, and then you had to fill in... It was co-written, my idea”3. John didn’t mind giving Paul the credit, saying later, “That's Paul doing his usual good job of producing what George Martin used to call a ‘potboiler’”2.

Paul had written the lyrics into a Liverpool Institute exercise book1,3. When John was called to help finish the song, he looked incredulously at Paul’s initial rhyme, “just seventeen/never been a beauty queen," and said, “What? Must change that”1. The line was changed to “you know what I mean.” Paul later modified this story slightly by saying that they both went “Ugh, this is one of these” and that “both of us cringed at that”3. But still later he gave John the sole credit for saying, “Beauty queen? Ugh!”4.

The inspiration for “I Saw Her Standing There” is not so clear. Paul said only that he wrote it for “our market" (seventeen-year-old girls)1. It has, however, been attributed with some force to Paul’s affinity for Iris Caldwell, an interesting figure in Beatles lore. Iris was the sister of Alan Caldwell, a.k.a. Rory Storm, who employed Ringo as drummer before he joined The Beatles. Her first boyfriend, at 12 years old, was a 14-year-old George Harrison (George even auditioned for Rory’s band), who remained close with the Caldwell family well into The Beatles’ career. Iris trained as a dancer and took a job performing at the Tower Ballroom in Liverpool. There, in December 1961, at the age of seventeen, she met another young man named Paul McCartney who was performing that night with The Beatles. He couldn't keep his eyes off her as she danced The Twist. Paul was impressed with her ambitions (and fishnet stockings), and they soon began dating. Iris remembered: “Paul and I dated for a couple of years. It was never that serious. We never pretended to be true to each other. I went out with lots of people. I was working away in different theatres at the time, but if I was back home then we would go out. There were never any promises made or love declared.” Iris never claimed to be the inspiration for this song, but she did state that Paul intended the song to be given to her brother, saying he thought “it would be a good song for him, but it wasn't dealt out that way. Brian Epstein didn't want Rory to have it”5.

The music for “I Saw Her Standing There” is an interesting story. Paul told Beat Instrumental magazine: “Here’s one example of a bit I pinched from someone: I used the bass riff from ‘Talkin’ About You’ by Chuck Berry in ‘I Saw Her Standing There.’ I played exactly the same notes as he did, and it fitted our number perfectly. Even now, when I tell people, I find few of them believe me. Therefore, I maintain that a bass riff hasn’t got to be original”11. MacDonald noted that Tony Sheridan’s “Eddie Cochrane guitar style” and “jive-hall ambience” were influences on the final recording, citing Martin’s use of the “1-2-3-faw!” count-off as evidence8.

The date of composition can be traced by some clues left for us. Paul once said, “I thought of the idea driving home from a concert in Southport”6. Referring back to the "Cavern Rehearsal” tape (1962, October, circa), it would appear that Paul's inspiration occurred shortly before August 1962, and indeed we find that The Beatles played two dates in Southport which correspond, July 23 and July 26. As further proof, a set-list for the August 3 Grafton gig does not include “I Saw Her Standing There”7 (113), prompting some belief that the song was still in the compositional stage at that point. Miles3 placed the completion date in September 1962, and MacDonald called that “a fair guess”8. But lest we think The Beatles were holding back this song for the album, we ought to know that it was played at the Star Club in December. More likely, its omission from any play in the UK was due to some missing spark in this song’s attitude, for the Cavern Rehearsal tape presents "I Saw Her Standing There" as more of a blues-beat “train” song with “clacking” drums, undoubtedly not the sound the boys were seeking (and the Star Club performances prove that point).

Now, a few inconsistencies in the source material. (1) "I Saw Her Standing There" had a much different style on the Cavern Rehearsal tape than on the Star Club tape, which means it was not really complete when John and Paul finished its composition. Yet Paul said, “We finished it that day”3, meaning the same day the duo were photographed working on this song9. There was obviously some confusion in either Paul's memory or his language. (2) Paul confused the issue again when he said, “We sagged off school, and wrote it on guitars, and a little bit on the piano that I had there”1. In fact, by 1962 they were no longer attending school. Perhaps Paul meant “sagged off" work. (3) Paul said also, “At the time, we were 18, 19, whatever”1. However, since he was born June 18, 1942, Paul would have been 20 when he sat down with John to complete the song. This conflict can be excused as an approximation by Paul. (4) Another time, Paul said, “All my first songs... were written on the Zenith; songs like ‘Michelle’ and ‘I Saw Her Standing There’”4, but the Zenith, Paul’s earliest guitar, was put aside by 1961: “Used this guitar until the Beatles' first trip to Hamburg. The Zenith... still hangs in his studio. He pulled it down for the Anthology video to play a bit of ‘Twenty Flight Rock'"10 (the guitar Paul is playing in the aforementioned photograph is not the Zenith, but a small Spanish guitar, perhaps a Framus). (5) Finally, Paul said that “I Saw Her Standing There” was one of the first Lennon-McCartney compositions, but this is not correct, since they had been writing together since 1960, “Ask Me Why” and “The One After 909” being two famous earlier examples.

It's possible that
Paul wrote "I Saw Her Standing There" in 1961. The Beatles did play Southport a few times that year (two before April, once on November 5)7 (82). Paul did write the lyrics into a Liverpool Institute exercise book, which could indicate he was still in school at the time, and that he was 18 or 19 years old. Paul did say he'd "started it," which could mean the germ of the idea came early, which would also correlate a little with his statement that this was one of the first Lennon-McCartney compositions, a standard normally given even if not earned. If 1961 is correct, it would also mean that Paul was correct about writing it on the Zenith guitar, and it fits perfectly that Paul nipped the bass part from "I'm Talking About You" (Berry) since that song was released in February 1961. Finally, this dating would not exclude Iris Caldwell as inspiration, since she would have been Paul's girlfriend when John and Paul worked up the final lyrics in 1962. Just a theory.

PHOTOS & INFORMATION: More photos from the day John and Paul composed this song are:
here.

1 Lewisohn, Recording Sessions, p.10
2 Sheff, All We Are Saying, p.193
3 Miles, Many Years From Now, pp.93-94
4 The Beatles Anthology, pp.20, 23
5 “Beatles Girls” website: here
6 Badman, The Beatles Off the Record, p.50
7 Lewisohn, The Beatles Live!, pp.82, 113
8 MacDonald, Revolution in the Head, pp.48-49
9 photo originally found in Remember, the Recollections and Photographs of Michael McCartney
10 “Paul McCartney’s Guitars” website: here
11 Flippo, Yesterday: the Unauthorized Biography of Paul McCartney (1988), p.197, repeated in later sources

_______________________________________________________________________

"A TASTE OF HONEY"

This third song recorded was originally a play by Shelagh Delaney, which premiered at a small fringe theater on the East End of London in May 1958, then moved to a larger theatre on the West End in 1959. If any of the lads knew of it, the subject matter may have been appealing to them, as it concerned sexuality, race relations, and changing social mores (and there is some reason to believe that John might have followed such revolutionary breakthroughs in British theatre), or perhaps one of them saw Ken Russel1's 1960 UK documentary on Delaney (America presented A Taste of Honey on Broadway in 1960, a smash hit starring Angela Lansbury and Billy Dee Williams).

The tune was originally an instrumental track for the stage play, and was included on an album by co-songwriter Bobby Scott, an accomplished saxophonist. It also was the theme song for the 1961 award-winning film of the same name. As previously mentioned (1962, October 25), the first vocal cover of this song by Lenny Welch was likely a great influence on The Beatles, as the arrangement is similar between their versions. However, we can’t discount Acker Bilk’s January 1963 release, which reached #16 on the UK Singles Chart, as having some sway on the Fab Four.

In 1965, Herb Alpert and the Tijuana Brass had a #7 hit in the United States with “A Taste of Honey,” also winning the Grammy for Record of the Year.

In 1967, Paul wrote “Your Mother Should Know” based on a line taken from the screenplay1.

RELATIVES: Take a gander at Shelagh Delaney: here, facts on the stage play: here, and information on the film: here.

RELATIVES: Get up to date with Mr. Acker Bilk: here.

1 MacDonald, Revolution in the Head, p.211

_______________________________________________________________________

"DO YOU WANT TO KNOW A SECRET"

Fourth to be recorded was this composition from John1. Credit has been disputed by Paul, who called it “a song we really wrote”2, and said, more forcefully, that it was a 50/50 collaborative effort3 (95). Some have proposed that Paul’s contribution was the middle eight, which is said to have a Buddy Holly feel and a “McCartney signature” descending bass line4.

The story of this song’s inspiration is as mysterious as it is interesting. What is the secret? In my opinion, there are five possibilities, as follows:

(1) The Secret Girlfriend. Liverpool Beatles fans knew quite well that Cynthia was John’s girlfriend. However, when Brian Epstein became The Beatles’ manager in October 1961, “he told John that it would be better if all girlfriends kept a low profile”5 (78).

(2) The Shotgun Wedding. Unwed, Cynthia discovered in July 1962 that she was pregnant by John5 (90). While this situation may or may not have been scandalous in scruffy Liverpool, it still meant that John was morally obliged, according to the times, to marry Cynthia: “The fact that he had to marry was disturbing to him”6. John said, “I was a bit shocked when Cynthia told me, but I said, ‘Yes, we'll have to get married.’ I didn't fight it”7. Cynthia’s side of this was a bit more romantic: “Eventually, I plucked up all my courage and told him. As the news sank in, he went pale and I saw the fear in his eyes. For a couple of minutes we were both silent. I watched him as I waited for a response. Would he walk out on me? Then he spoke: ‘There’s only one thing for it, Cyn. We’ll have to get married.’ I asked him whether he meant it. I told him he didn’t have to marry me, that I was prepared to manage on my own, but he was insistent. ‘Neither of us planned to have a baby, Cyn, but I love you and I’m not going to leave you now’”5 (91). She continued, “Many commentators on John’s life have said that he would never have married me if I hadn’t been pregnant... Totally wrong”5 (93). John said somewhat differently: “I got married before I even knew what religion my wife was. Anyway, I never asked her... I just did it without thinking, she could have been anything”8 (although the subject of this Q-and-A was religion, not marriage, John’s demeanor seemed doleful, not happy).

At the time of the wedding, The Beatles, though not yet a household name worldwide (they hadn’t even released “Love Me Do”), were wildly popular in Liverpool. Brian didn’t want John to marry, as he believed The Beatles needed to retain an “available young men” image, and he told John to think about it, that he didn’t have to do it. Cynthia wrote, “No doubt Brian was thinking about the future of the group... But John insisted he wanted to marry me and Brian agreed to help”5 (92). After deciding to wed, John became panicked that being married would interfere with his career as a musician. Cynthia respected John’s fear; but, more so, “I respected him enormously for standing by me when he knew it might ruin his career, just as he was on the brink of success. He had a streak of fundamental decency that went far beyond simply observing the convention of the day, and I loved him for it”5 (93). John gave a slightly different account of his feelings at the time: “I thought it would be goodbye to the group, getting married, because everybody said it would be. None of us ever took girls to the Cavern as we thought we would lose fans (which turned out to be a farce in the end)”7.

On August 23, 1962, John married Cynthia (six weeks pregnant) in a semi-secret ceremony: “They tried to keep the marriage secret from Beatles fans, but one of the tea ladies from the Cavern saw them coming out of the register office, and the news leaked out, though they denied it”7. Ringo, new to the band, was also kept in the dark, having joined only five days earlier: “I didn't go to the wedding. John never even told me he'd got married. John and Cynthia were keeping it a secret from everyone. If something got mentioned it was, ‘Shh, Ring's in the room.’ It was kept from me because I wasn't considered a real member at the beginning. I was in the band, but emotionally I had to earn my way in. John didn't tell me anything until we went on tour and got to know each other in all the doss houses where we camped”9 (73).

(3) The Hidden Apartment. Brian’s wedding present to the couple was their own place, an apartment he’d used from time to time for his homosexual encounters. The flat, at 36 Falkner Street*, Liverpool, was unknown to the obsessive Beatles fans in town, and Brian wanted John and Cynthia to lead a private life, away from the press and fans, for the good of the band, and for the safety of Cynthia and her child. John said, “I'd just married Cyn, and Brian Epstein gave us his secret little apartment that he kept in Liverpool for his sexual liaisons; separate from his home life”1.

*correct spelling per Google maps; Cynthia misspelled it “Faulkener” in her book; other misspellings in various sources are “Falkener” and “Faulkner”

(4) The Life of Brian. In those days, especially in rugged Liverpool, homosexuality was looked upon poorly, and Brian Epstein was gay. This fact was well-known to The Beatles, but not to the public.

Another infamous part to this concerns John's relationship with Brian. Cynthia wrote, “Claims have been made that Brian and John had a gay relationship. Nothing could be further from the truth. John was a hundred percent heterosexual and, like most lads at the time, horrified by the idea of homosexuality. The bond between John and Brian was one of mutual respect and friendship. They liked and admired each other. Brian could see John’s intelligence and distinctive talent. John appreciated Brian’s business acumen and his ambition for the group. They talked for hours and planned the band’s future together. They both wanted the Beatles to be the biggest thing since Elvis, and were hell bent on making it happen”5 (78).

In the Spring of 1963, John and Brian took a holiday together to Spain. When they returned to England, John was infuriated that “he had to put up with sly digs, winks, and innuendo that he was secretly gay” 5 (115). On June 18,1963, at Paul’s twenty-first birthday party, John, drunk, pummeled Bob Wooler (Cavern DJ and friend to all The Beatles) when the latter made a crack that questioned John’s heterosexuality 5 (115). Some sources (for example, Brown & Gaines, The Love You Make) tell a completely different story, weaving smut at a sunny villa in Spain. The choice to believe or not is ours to make (I choose not).

(5) The Beatle Wife. After the marriage, Cynthia was kept “hidden at home”5 (119). John parsed, “We didn't keep it secret, it's just that when we first came on the scene nobody really asked us. They weren't interested whether we were married or not. The question they used to ask was, ‘What kind of girls do you like?’ And if you get our early news sheets it says ‘blondes.’ I wasn't going to say, ‘I'm married,’ but I never said, ‘I'm not.’” George added, “It wasn’t hushed up; it just wasn’t mentioned in the press”9 (73). Riley wrote, “When the Beatles came along, John’s marriage was an open secret... His onscreen ID during the Beatles’ debut on Ed Sullivan revealed, ‘Sorry girls, he’s married.’ Manager Brian Epstein was cheeky about Lennon being ‘spoken for’ and yet the truth was more involved: his being spoken for only attested to his adult status, and greater desirability... None of this encroached on their individual or collective sex appeal one iota”10. However, we need to keep these reports in proper context, as the lyrics for “Do You Want To Know A Secret” were written well before the Beatles whirlwind success. At this point in the story, the marriage was not yet an “open secret” and Cynthia was a voluntary prisoner. I say voluntary because, apparently, “Cynthia was all for keeping their marriage quiet: ‘It was bad enough John being recognized and chased everywhere. I didn’t want that to happen to me’”7.

Falkner Street proved to be a seedy place with scary characters, so Cynthia moved back in with John’s Aunt Mimi in November 1962. There, she continued to keep the marriage and pregnancy secret at all costs, to her emotional detriment. After Julian was born (April 8, 1963), the secrecy continued (note that many sources incorrectly state that Cynthia remained at Falkner Street until Julian’s birth). Simultaneously (in a sad but comical double standard), Paul made no effort at hiding his relationship with Jane Asher – the “wife and child” bit apparently more “dangerous” to the welfare of the Beatles5 (119). Ostensibly, John was quite upset that Cynthia was hidden, but he did little or nothing to relieve that situation (marriage obviously did not suit him, and John partied relentlessly while on the road with The Beatles). In 1968, he said, “I did feel embarrassed, being married. Walking about, married. It was like walking about with odd socks on, your fly open”7.

Which of these secrets was the true inspiration? Who can say?

According to Turner11, the titular “secret” is that John had just realized that he was really in love with Cynthia. We can’t rule out this possibility. It’s not that difficult to picture Cynthia being somewhat happy (married, with child, to her sweetheart), yet depressed (knowing John’s unhappiness with marriage, knowing John’s popularity with other women). We can imagine Cynthia asking John, “Do you really love me?” and John responding coyly, “Sshh. It’s a secret.” Maybe to cheer up his expectant wife, he conceived the lyrics, even sang them to her. We simply don’t know.

Although by all accounts John didn’t relish being married, and probably resented the changes in his life, he dutifully kept his mouth shut as well as he could for the welfare of Cynthia, his unborn child, his family, Brian, and for the band’s future. However, knowing his temperament against restraint, his proclivity for emotional honesty, and his mischievousness, it’s easy to see how John could be motivated to rebellion against his gag order, and to write a song which would give him at least a little release: “Listen... do you want to know a secret (which one?)... do you promise not to tell (the press?)...” This song could be such an outlet, though it is so couched in fluffy teenage love that one would never imagine that John was bursting at the seams with angst. In a way, we might consider this an early form of John’s primal scream therapy.

“Do You Want to Know A Secret” was written between August 23, 1962, the day John and Cynthia moved into Brian’s apartment, and November 1, 1962, the day The Beatles left for Hamburg. The starting date is upheld by John, who linked Falkner Street as the place of composition1, and the latter date is upheld by Cynthia, who moved permanently out of that apartment, to Mimi’s, shortly after The Beatles left for Germany5 (103). This chronology allows for any of the secrets. The line “I’ve known a secret for the week or two” makes it appear that this song was written within a short time of the secret becoming known, but this doesn’t really help.

Undermining the entire idea that this song has deep meaning, Paul called it “nothing much”2. This air of ambivalence later devolved into almost hatred when Miles related that Paul called this a “hack song... written to order”3 (95). Either Paul (1) had absolutely no idea or recollection of the song’s importance, (2) intentionally buried the secrets of “...Secret” under ravaging denial, or (3) we are barking up the wrong tree and this song has no underlying meaning. Of the third theory, we can discard it since John answered that this song’s origins lie in that secret apartment following his secret wedding. Of the second theory, it is intriguing to believe that Paul was hiding something he considered sinister or debilitating but, given the number of books published on these subjects, it also seems wholly unnecessary (but that could have been a ruse!). Of the first theory, perhaps this is the most plausible, though least interesting; maybe Paul was simply oblivious to the connections between this song and reality (or, like a great lightning bolt, conspiracy theorists might say that only a “faux Paul” would have no recollection of this song’s true origin). One more thought: if Paul wrote “I’ve known the secret for a week or two” (the middle-eight he possibly contributed), was it a secret of Paul’s? I think not. More likely, he was simply adding to the ballad of the John and Cynthia.

While the idea for this song seems to have sprung from John’s life circumstances, some wording and phrasing originated with Walt Disney’s Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs (1937): “The idea came from this thing my mother used to sing to me when I was one or two years old, when she was still living with me. It was from a Disney movie: ‘Do you want to know a secret? Promise not to tell? You are standing by a wishing well.’ So, with that in my head, I wrote the song”1 (Playboy). Ryan wrote, “It is an early example of how precious any association with his mother’s memory was to become”12. At times, John misremembered the Disney movie as Cinderella or Fantasia13, or it has been incorrectly reported that “it was a line John remembered that Jiminy Cricket asks Pinocchio”14. Once again, Paul’s statement that this song was "nothing much" is undercut.


George said that the music for this song was inspired, to some extent, by “I Really Love You,” a rhythm-and-blues hit for The Stereos in 196115. Notably, the words “I really love you” appear at the start of “Do You Want to Know A Secret.” Paul stated that the music was somewhat more original: “We knew that in E if you went to an A-flat minor, you could always make a song with those chords; that change pretty much always excited you. This is one of those. Certainly ‘Do You Want To Know A Secret’ was”3 (163).

Whether John wrote it for himself as catharsis, or for Cynthia as solace, we know that by February 1963 John felt no special connection to this song, because he deliberately made it George’s debut. John said, “I wrote it and just gave it to George to sing”1. But that doesn’t mean it was meant for George: “I can’t say that I wrote it ‘for’ George”1. Paul contradicted John by saying that “Do You Want to Know A Secret” was written specifically “for George to sing. Before he wrote his own stuff, John and I wrote things for him and Ringo to do”2 , but I am not predisposed to give Paul much credence here.

This brings us to another puzzle, which is, If the song meant so much to John, why did he give it to George? “I thought it would be a good vehicle for him, because it had only three notes and he wasn't the best singer in the world. He has improved a lot since then; but in those days, his ability was very poor. I gave it to him just to give him a piece of the action. That's another reason why I was hurt by his book. I even went to the trouble of making sure he got the B-side of a Beatles single, because he hadn't had a B-side of one until ‘Do You Want to Know a Secret’”1. This statement by John requires examination:

(1) John went out of his way to say just how very awful George’s singing ability was in 1963. This is debatable. Certainly John was one of the best rock singers of all time, but it seems like a stab in the back professionally, as George was an excellent backup singer. This part of John’s statement may have been revenge, John hurt personally by George (“by his book”). Taking the opposite view, it is a common enough observation that George lacked a brilliant vocal range (though his tone was melodic enough). Even George agreed that his vocal for this song was sub-par: “I didn't like my vocal on it. I didn't know how to sing; nobody told me how to sing: ‘Listen, do da do, Do you want to know a secret? do da do, Do you promise not to tell...’”9 (92). I think we can safely assume that George meant he needed guidance with his lead vocal ability, for surely he was not lacking confidence in the realm of backing vocals.

(2) To give a song to a poor singer would indicate that the song is not a winner. How then was this equivalent to giving George “a piece of the action”? Should George be thankful for receiving John’s garbage?

(3) John described this song as “only three notes.” Not only is this a false statement – “it spans a ninth, F# to G#1, including falsetto tones”16 - but it is also a deep and unnecessary dig on George’s vocal range.

(4) Most telling, John’s statement about George receiving a B-side is absolutely incorrect, for four reasons. First, “Do You Want to Know A Secret” was never a B-side, not even in the United States. Second, the first intentional Harrison B-side (that is, on a UK single) was “The Inner Light” (1968). Third, there is no evidence that John ever fought for George’s representation on any Beatles single. Fourth, “Do You Want to Know A Secret” was an A-side in America (see below), a status not due to John’s intervention on George’s behalf.

Given these things, the only reasonable conclusion is that John gave “Do You Want to Know a Secret” to George because he felt the song was beneath him. This might also explain why he gave Billy J. Kramer a demo of this particular song (see below). One layer down, there may be an additional answer, that John gave this song away because he felt that i he sang the lyrics it would be a betrayal of responsibility put on him by Brian and Cynthia.

Besides giving this song to George, John also taped a demo of “Do You Want to Know a Secret” for Billy J. Kramer and the Dakotas. Brian Epstein had signed this band in January 1963, and it seems reasonable to say that Billy J. may have needed a little enticement to get him to sign with Brian, and that John provided the necessary motivation with a Beatles composition, this being sufficient due to the Fab Four’s recording contract with Parlophone (though The Beatles had yet to crack Top 40). In other words, a carrot on a stick. Some sources claim that John taped the demo while sitting in a lavatory (John in the john, as it were) at The Star Club in Hamburg, Germany, during their final run there (1962, December 18-31)4. Billy J. Kramer put it this way: “I had this tape given to me, and it was John Lennon singing it with an acoustic guitar. On the tape he said, ‘I’m sorry for the sound quality, but it’s the quietest room I could find in the whole building.’ Then he flushed the toilet”17. Kramer didn't mention Hamburg, but the idea that John could find no quieter place to record than a bathroom would indicate a busy and bustling place, which describes that section of Hamburg where the band quartered. When we add in that The Beatles lived there in a crowded hotel with other British bands18, this picture of John recording in the lav gains plausibility. Sadly, the demo is lost, so we cannot examine it forensically. Unterberger19 wrote that the demo was recorded in early 1963 (not in Hamburg), since The Beatles recorded their version of this song in February, and Billy J. Kramer and the Dakotas recorded theirs the following month (Unterberger did not explain his carbon-dating). Concerning the flush of the toilet, perhaps it’s what John thought of the song, or of the deal Brian made with Billy J. Kramer, and he decided to add the sound for emphasis.

Billy J. Kramer and the Dakotas recorded “Do You Want to Know A Secret,” on March 21, 1963, with George Martin at the producer’s helm, and released it in the UK on April 26. Most sources say it hit #2, unable to topple The Beatles’ “From Me To You,” but some3 (180), e.g. claim it hit #1. Thus began a long and fruitful career for the Lennon-McCartney team as songwriters for other artists.


(above) Billy J. Kramer's single

It seems incredible that at this fragile early period John should be giving away songs, especially at a time when The Beatles needed every one they could muster for their first LP (and only “Love Me Do” under their belt), yet it’s true that John and Paul gave away not necessarily second-rate material to a slew of artists. In 1963 alone, besides “Do You Want to Know A Secret,” the following Lennon-McCartney compositions were released by others:

“Misery”
(Kenny Lynch), released 3/22/63 (UK), which did not chart;

“I Saw Her Standing There”
(Duffy Power with the Graham Bond Quartet), released 4/26/63 (UK), which did not chart;

“I’ll Be On My Way”
(Billy J. Kramer and the Dakotas, b-side to “Do You Want to Know A Secret”), of which Paul said, “A little bit too ‘June-moon’ for me”3 (180);

“Bad to Me” b/w “I Call Your Name”
(Billy J. Kramer and the Dakotas), released 7/26/63 (UK), which hit #1 in the UK, written by John between April 28 and May 10, 1963, while on holiday in Spain with Brian Epstein20;

“Tip of My Tongue”
(Tommy Quickly), released 7/30/63 (UK), which did not chart;

“Hello Little Girl”
(The Fourmost), released 8/20/63 (UK), which hit #9 in the UK, of which John said, “Me. This was another very early song of mine”21, and “That was actually my first song... It’s also connected to my mother. It’s all very Freudian”1;

“Love of the Loved”
(Cilla Black), released 9/27/63 (UK), which hit #35 in the UK, of which John said: “Paul. One of his very early songs, but I think he changed the words later for Cilla”21, and “That’s another of Paul’s written when he was a teenager”1;

“I’ll Keep You Satisfied”
(Billy J. Kramer & the Dakotas), released 11/1/63 (UK), which hit #4 in the UK, of which Paul said, “That was a good one. Billy J. was having a bit of success and, because he was out of the same stable as us, it made sense for us, if we weren't having to write a lot of stuff for ourselves, to knock off a couple for friends. It was pretty much co-written. John and I sat down and purposely wrote it for Billy J. in a couple of hours. This one is one I still like. I find myself whistling it in the garden”3 (180), but John gave the full credit to Paul1,21;

“I Wanna Be Your Man”
(The Rolling Stones), released 11/1/63 (UK), which hit #10 in the UK;

“I’m In Love”
(The Fourmost), released 11/1/63 (UK), which hit #17 in the UK, of which John said, “That sounds like me. I don’t remember a hell of a thing about it.”1

Brian’s stable was a powerhouse. In May 1962, hot on the heels of landing The Beatles, he signed Gerry and the Pacemakers. By 1963, he was also managing The Fourmost, The Big Three, Billy J. Kramer and the Dakotas, and Tommy Quickly. By 1964, he’d grabbed Cilla Black, The Remo Four, and Sounds Incorporated. One source16 intimates that, by urging John and Paul to write hit songs for his other artists, Brian was hedging his bets with The Beatles. Not that we can blame him; Brian was a businessman, after all. Other sources18, e.g., however, vehemently disagree, stating that The Beatles were always Brian’s first priority, and that he worked doggedly, often to his own detriment, to create the sensation that we all know and love.

1 Sheff, All We Are Saying; “Playboy” indicates from the original interview transcript
2 Playboy interview, 1984
3 Miles, Many Years From Now, p.95, 163, 180
4 MacDonald, Revolution in the Head, p.51
5 Cynthia Lennon, John, pp.78, 90-93, 103, 115, 119
6 Barrow, John, Paul, George, Ringo, and Me
7 Davies, The Beatles, p.153
8 press conference, Los Angeles, August 23, 1964
9 The Beatles Anthology, p.73, 92
10 Riley, Fever: How Rock n Roll Transformed Gender in America, p.191
11 Turner, A Hard Day’s Write
12 Ryan, John Lennon’s Secret (1982), p.24
13 Aldridge, Beatles Illustrated Lyrics 2 (1971)
14 Brown & Gaines, The Love You Make, p.82
15 Musician magazine, November 1987
16 Everett, The Beatles as Musicians: The Quarrymen Through Rubber Soul, p.151
17 liner notes to 1991 CD, The Best of Billy J. Kramer and the Dakotas: The Definitive Collection
18 Norman, Shout! (et al)
19 Unterberger, The Unreleased Beatles
20 Miles, The Beatles: A Diary
21 Record-Mirror, October 1971

_______________________________________________________________________

GENERAL REFS: Winn, Way Beyond Compare; Lewisohn, Chronicles; Castleman & Podrazik, All Together Now

_______________________________________________________________________

RELATIVES: Follow the exploits of Cynthia: here.

TOURISM: Seek out the secret apartment at 36 Falkner Street, Liverpool.

_______________________________________________________________________
Although I use quotes from sources, or cited fact, much of the material on this and other pages of my blog is original, from my own pen. This is not cut-and-paste, it is a work of art. Copyright © 2010 Tom Wise.

Saturday, December 11, 2010

1962, August 22 & September 5: Sources!



On this special date, August 22, 1962 (the first circulating recording with Beatle Ringo; also perchance the day before John married the pregnant Cynthia), Granada Television was at the Cavern to film for a local “magazine” show, Know the North. However, the performance and/or tape wasn’t exactly right, so on September 5, also at the Cavern, they re-recorded the audio for two songs, “Some Other Guy” and “Kansas City/Hey-Hey-Hey-Hey” (note that, in The Beatles Live!, Lewisohn put the lads in London on September 5, unable to return to Liverpool for some reason; this is in error, and Lewisohn amended himself in Chronicles). Ultimately, this program never aired, for whatever reason, but the footage was nevertheless happily preserved; and, when The Beatles became white-hot, “Some Other Guy” was broadcast on a different show, Scene at 6:30, November 6, 1963.

Much has been made of “Some Other Guy” in Beatles lore, and not without good reason. The song simply rocks, and The Beatles’ version is among their best performances of any song. Here, they are young, strong, and invulnerable. John told Rolling Stone in 1968, “I’d like to make a record like ‘Some Other Guy.’ I haven’t done one that satisfies me as much as that satisfied me.” Even in 1974, John told Dennis Elsas, when co-hosting the disc jockey’s WNEW-FM (New York) radio program, that the opening notes of “Instant Karma” were influenced by those of “Some Other Guy.”

_______________________________________________________________________

TRACKS:

“SOME OTHER GUY” (Leiber/Stoller/Barrett)

“KANSAS CITY/HEY-HEY-HEY-HEY” (Leiber/Stoller & Penniman)

“MONEY (That’s What I Want)” (Barrett Strong)... not definite

_______________________________________________________________________

AUDIO

“SOME OTHER GUY”

Necessary Information. The Anthology DVD brought several things to light. First, the announcement from Bob Wooler (Cavern DJ and “compere”) on the DVD (“At this midday session at the Cavern, we proudly present The Beatles!”) is different from the announcement on all previous known versions (“It’s... the Beatles!” or “OK, this is it. The Beatles sing ‘Some Other Guy’!”). Second, on the Anthology DVD, an edit occurs at about eight seconds into the music (about 13 seconds into the track), denoting the edit at which Apple affixed the longer announcement. Third, while the announcement is different on the Anthology DVD, the performance itself is the same as any other August 22 performance which circulates. This is proven by noting that the various hoots and hollers from the audience match. Fourth, the sound glitch (also known as “varispeed” or “tape stretch”) which occurs at approximately 0:46 into the track on the Anthology DVD is the same as that which occurs at approximately 0:44 on all previous known versions (the difference in time naturally attributed to the lengths of the several introductions). Fifth, after the song ends on the Anthology DVD, a young man clearly yells “We Want Pete!” (for Pete Best), to which John dryly responds, “Yes,” and this is followed by sympathetic uproar for drummer Best, the latter element echoed greatly for effect. All previous known versions fade during “We Want Pete!”.

Since August 22 was a midday performance, and the September 5 re-recording took place at evening, I assign the announcement on the Anthology DVD as the original. Though it is possible that this announcement was created at a later time (either August 22 or September 5) to simulate some original excitement, I think it unlikely that anyone would have had the forethought to include the word “midday” at such time, the evidence being that the two other extant announcements do no such thing. It might be argued that the edit on the Anthology DVD proves the announcement thereon to be from a later time, but by this argument it is just as likely that the performance after the edit is a re-take from August 22 (the September 5 re-recording doesn’t enter into the discussion, as it sounds completely different throughout), and that the announcement is the original. In fact, there is proof that “Some Other Guy” was performed more than once on the afternoon of August 22 (most historians concede twice, not including the August 22 evening show, by which time the Granada Television crew would certainly have moved on), and it comes in the form of both audio and video evidence (below). If this is true, it would explain quite neatly how it is possible for the same performance (ostensibly from August 22) to have different announcements on different releases. As for the motive to re-take this song, we have only to notice that only one performance purporting to be from August 22 has ever circulated or been released, which indicates that the “first performance” (that is, the August 22 performance which I believe directly followed the announcement used for Anthology) was very bad, or else the film of that first performance became damaged (but not lost, or else we should think the announcement lost as well); and this theory is more plausible by the fact that Apple did not use that first performance, even though they used its announcement. If the first performance had been of any value at all, there would be no reason to expect Apple to perform a surgical procedure to affix the original announcement to a re-take of “Some Other Guy,” especially since that re-take includes the glitch at (circa) 0:45 into the song, a terrible aural experience. Certainly, we cannot think that Apple deliberately used the “glitch tape” if a superior tape was handy, especially since they took the trouble to replace the announcement.

Having, I think, satisfactorily explained how the Anthology DVD audio is constructed, and why the original announcement was used without the first performance, I now move on with two more puzzles. The first puzzle is, Why did Apple use the original announcement rather than simply keeping the announcement which was ever heard up until the release of Anthology, that is, “It’s... The Beatles!” Here, we can make a very positive assumption, which is that Apple wanted to incorporate the historical integrity of the original announcement; and, rather than give us the original announcement with a very flawed first take of “Some Other Guy” (whether the performance or the tape itself), they decided to give us the original announcement with a slightly-flawed later take of “Some Other Guy” (the glitch). The edit proves the stitch job, and the longer announcement, having more historical information, provides evidence for the theory. The second puzzle is, Why did Apple use even a slightly-flawed take of “Some Other Guy”? One theory (per Winn) is that the glitch is on the original tape of the performance, and this would certainly explain everything. A contrary theory, which appears to have some basis (Gottfridsson, From Cavern to Star Club, p.217; also: here), is that the glitch comes as the result of a clumsy attempt by EMI to create (supposedly, in the mid-1970’s) an audio tape copy from the original film (reason unknown); but even if this were true, why didn’t Apple use the original film for Anthology rather than a flawed audio copy? Was the original film missing? If so, where did it go? Obviously, this latter theory kicks up more questions than it answers.

The most sensible conclusion therefore, is that, for Anthology, Apple constructed the audio for “Some Other Guy” by using (for historical integrity) the original announcement from the first performance, and editing this announcement to a slightly-flawed later take of “Some Other Guy” (probably from the original film’s soundtrack).

Before Anthology, the audio that commonly accompanied the video for “Some Other Guy” used Bob Wooler’s announcement, “It’s... The Beatles!” (this is also known as the “vintage version”). The sound on this “vintage version” is also “dirtier” (more snaps and wrinkles) than on Anthology (perhaps more evidence that Anthology used an original tape). Beginning in the mid-1970’s (a generic time frame that dovetails with the more complicated theory concerning the glitch), “Some Other Guy” was broadcast on a few TV specials, notably 1983’s The Early Beatles (see VIDEO below).

The September 5 re-recording is entirely different. The intro (“OK, this is it. The Beatles sing ‘Some Other Guy’”) is followed by a count-in from Paul. The song is played at a slower pace (or the tape runs slow), and the glitch is naturally missing from this new performance. At the end, there is cheering, followed by John saying, “We’ll probably have to do it again.” Despite sources to the contrary, this audio version was never used for an official video overdub, but it was preserved on an acetate. According to Winn, five 7” two-sided acetates (“Some Other Guy”/ “Kansas City”) were made on September 5, 1962, two of which were given to Bob Wooler for promotional purposes; one of these was purchased by Apple at a 1993 Christie’s auction (whereabouts unknown for the others). Brian Epstein also had a “batch” of double-sided records (both sides “Some Other Guy”) manufactured to sell at NEMS; one of these sold at a 1982 Sotheby's auction (whereabouts unknown for the others). You can read more about both auctions: here.

Anthology Version. The Anthology DVD version is, of course, on the DVD, and on various bootlegs. You can also listen to it: here (appropriately titled “Take 1 & 2”). Purple Chick’s Strong Before Our Birth, Disc 2, track 31 (detailed information on this boot: here), not only inaccurately termed this version “alternate introduction” (a nod to Winn, who titled it “take 2”), but also "fixed" the glitch.

Vintage Version. The audio on The Early Beatles DVD (see VIDEO below) has the most complete ending, with “We Want Pete!” and John saying “yes” (but the “sympathetic uproar” is cut off). You can also listen to it: here (appropriately titled “Take 2”). Strong Before Our Birth (taken from the boot Can You Hear Me?), Disc 2, track 22, is not only inaccurately called “original version” (after Winn’s “take 1”), but the glitch is again "fixed" (not "vintage") and the ending fades too quickly (during “We Want Pete!”).

Acetate Version. This September 5 version is on Strong Before Our Birth, Disc 2, track 23 (taken from Can You Hear Me?). You can also listen to it: here.

“KANSAS CITY” (shorthand title)

Necessary Information. This song was also filmed on August 22, but the audio is missing, and only the September 5 re-recording survives, on the aforementioned two-sided acetate.

Acetate. A portion of the acetate was included in the Anthology TV broadcast, then a bit more on the DVD, and this segment is on Strong Before Our Birth, Disc 2, track 24. Winn commented that this track runs slow.

OOPS. An out-of-phase (OOPS) playback of the Acetate version, which attempts to remove all of the Anthology voice-over, is: here.

_______________________________________________________________________

VIDEO

"SOME OTHER GUY"

Necessary Information. Video was taken twice, on August 22 and September 5, 1962, but only August 22 is available, the latter date’s film presumed lost. Nevertheless, there is a distinction made between the films, which is that two microphones were used on August 22, and three microphones on September 5. Winn and others state that only one microphone was used for August 22, but there are no videos which show only one microphone (neither are there any which show three), but all videos (including those which use “alternate footage”) show two microphones.

The Anthology DVD not only uses slightly modified audio (as detailed above), but also a mix of film from (ostensibly) both versions of “Some Other Guy” performed on August 22 (the video evidence previously mentioned). Note that the Anthology version is freeze-framed before “We Want Pete!” is yelled, and over the start of the video is captioned “The Cavern Club, 22nd August 1962.”

The video version most familiar (and thus sometimes referred to as the “vintage version”) is likely a copy from Granada TV’s January 1, 1983 (sometimes called 1984) broadcast of The Early Beatles (more information: here, and here). Besides the different audio (as detailed above), this video includes different cutaway shots.

There is no video version that utilizes any footage from September 5. Any video which purports to be so, by mux-ing the September 5 acetate with footage from August 22, should be considered fan-created. One commonly-circulating example begins with people walking downstairs to the Cavern as Bob Wooler makes his announcement (“OK, this is it...”).

Analysis of the differing film snippets from August 22 is: here, with an accompanying photo gallery from the film: here.

Anthology Version. Besides on the DVD, this version can be viewed: here, and sometimes on YouTube.

Vintage Version. This version is (I think) most complete on The Early Beatles 1962-1965 (Darthdisc DVD). It can also be seen: here, and on YouTube. Note that on some cuts of this version, the intro is missing. Another variety of this version has a timecode, but the end dissolves before “We Want Pete!” is yelled.

Mux Version. This creation is in very good quality on the boot DVD collection Chronology 1962-1970, Volume 1, and it’s worth it for the different footage, even if the video cuts off early (a consequence of mismatched audio and video).

The Compleat Beatles Version. Although the video does not contain the complete audio (and the introduction by Bob Wooler is from an unrelated event!), there are some differently-sequenced video portions which may be of interest.

“KANSAS CITY”

Necessary Information. There is no video that can be said to absolutely utilize any footage of “Kansas City” from August 22 (film taken, cut to pieces in unknown manner) or from September 5 (film presumed lost), 1962. Any video which purports to be so, by mux-ing the September 5 acetate with any footage, is only an educated guess at best, a fraud at worst.

Mux (Collage) Version. View: here.

"MONEY" (?)

Necessary Information. About 2 minutes, 50 seconds of silent footage from August 22 has emerged from the Granada TV vault, with at least 71 individual reverse-angle and close-up shots. It is conjectured (MacKenzie, Every Little Thing) that “Money” (to name one song) is being viewed.

This footage is on Darthdisc’s The Early Beatles 1962-1965 DVD, and can also be viewed here (called “alternate outtakes”), albeit in a different sequence. I have also seen it on YouTube.

_______________________________________________________________________

PHOTOS & INFORMATION: Snaps of the Fab Four setting up for the August 22 performance is: here.

RELATIVES: Bob Wooler died in 2002. A good overview of the man is: here. An interview is: here.

_______________________________________________________________________

Tom Wise
gengar843@msn.com

Although I use quotes from sources, or cited fact, much of the material on this and other pages of my blog is original, from my own pen. This is not cut-and-paste, it is a work of art. Copyright © 2010 Tom Wise


1962, October 25 (disputed)


BACKGROUND

The Beatles’ success continued, and Ringo tasted more of it this day, his first appearance on BBC Radio. At an 8:00 pm taping for Here We Go, several songs were performed in front on a live audience at the Playhouse Theatre in Manchester, to be broadcast the next day at 5:00 pm.

Only a snippet of "A Taste of Honey" survives. “A Taste of Honey” was first released to vinyl by Lenny Welch, on September 17, 1962, meaning that The Beatles were quick studies. Some sources have placed the date of this fragmentary relic on October 29, 1962, when the band appeared on the UK TV program People and Places. Winn doubted this placement, but Sulpy wrote that People and Places was a possibility (but mistakenly dated the show as October 19).

(ref: Winn, Way Beyond Compare; Sulpy, Complete Beatles Audio Guide (2006); Lewisohn, Chronicles)

_______________________________________________________________________

TRACKS:

"A TASTE OF HONEY” (Scott/Marlow) - fragment (0:52)
“Love Me Do” – not available
“P.S. I Love You” – not available

_______________________________________________________________________

AUDIO SOURCE: Purple Chick's bootleg The Complete
BBC Sessions - Upgraded for 2004, Disc 1 (detailed information: here) provides the cleanest, most complete, and speed-checked experience.

On Artifacts 1, CD 1: The Early Years, this recording is described as from People and Places, and runs at the wrong speed, as noted: here.

You can find a comprehensive history of The Beatles at the Beeb bootleg releases: here.

VIDEO: None.

PHOTOS & INFORMATION: Photos from this date (if this audio derives from October 29) are: here.

_______________________________________________________________________

Tom Wise
gengar843@msn.com

Although I use quotes from sources, or cited fact, much of the material on this and other pages of my blog is original, from my own pen. This is not cut-and-paste, it is a work of art. Copyright © 2010 Tom Wise.

1962, September 11: Sources: Please Please Me (Andy White)


“PLEASE PLEASE ME”

The Mono mix from this day's session with Andy White was released on Anthology 1.

An odd refutation of the Anthology 1 liner notes came in a letter to Belmo’s Beatleg News, issue #52, which staked a claim that this mix is from the November 26, 1962 recording session. If true, it would indicate that either Andy White played with The Beatles on November 26 (meaning that Anthology 1 participates in a conspiracy), or else Anthology 1 simply has the date wrong (meaning that the drummer on this mix is Ringo).

_______________________________________________________________________

VIDEO

None.

_______________________________________________________________________

Tom Wise
gengar843@msn.com

Although I use quotes from sources, or cited fact, much of the material on this and other pages of my blog is original, from my own pen. This is not cut-and-paste, it is a work of art. Copyright © 2010 Tom Wise.

1962, August 22 & September 5: Back-Story




(left) Pete Best in Beatles publicity shot; (right) Pete sings "Peppermint Twist"

The June 6 recording session had been promising, but George Martin was single-minded to replace Pete Best at drums whenever The Beatles were to record; on the road would be the business of the band. We don’t know the exact day that Martin transmitted this message to Brian Epstein, nor do we know exactly when John, Paul, and George made up their mind to officially sack Pete and/or replace him with Ringo Starr, but there seems to have been a juncture of purpose which left the lads with only one destiny, in much the same manner that John decided to partner with Paul rather than to exclude him for his competing leadership and talent. Thus, on August 15, 1962, Brian was given the unenviable job of dismissing Pete, which he did on August 16 (also at that time offering the stunned drummer an opportunity to form a Beatles spin-off, The Merseybeats). John later told Hunter Davies, "We were cowards when we sacked him. We made Brian do it," but "It would probably have ended in a fight if we'd told him”1. Although fired (and in shock), Pete agreed to stay on a few days until Ringo could join, but changed his mind so quickly that Johnny Hutchinson (of The Big Three) was necessary to fill in for a show the same day. This temporary condition only lasted two days, for on August 18, 1962 Ringo joined The Beatles for their Hulme Hall, Birkinhead gig.

It’s not as if Ringo was a stranger to The Beatles, for he had been as much a Liverpool and Hamburg fixture as any of them (playing most famously for Rory Storm and the Hurricanes, but also in Germany for Tony Sheridan), and was quite admired. In October 1960, Ringo (not Pete Best) played drums for Lu Walters on “Summertime” as John, Paul, and George added further instrumentation2 (Lost or Missing Tapes, 1957-1962). In fact, “Ringo had been keen to join them for some time – he had even sat in with them on two occasions when Pete Best was ill (both were Cavern Club lunchtime sessions, the dates untraceable by the author)”3.

In what may be the most sordid episode in The Beatles’ career, the details remain murky. According to Pete, the real reason for his dismissal was never made clear to him. In a 1999 appearance, the following exchange took place during a question-and-answer period:

Q. Were you ever told the reasons for your sacking?

A. No, but let's look at the theories. I can’t accept the drumming theory, as when we came back from Germany other groups copied my style using the loud bass drum. Also, Bert Kaempfert was quite happy with my drumming when we recorded in Germany. As for Ringo being a better drummer, well, he was replaced on "Love Me Do" as well, wasn’t he? The hairstyle? That’s all rubbish, it was never even discussed. Jealousy? I was aware of the Pete Best fans, but there were plenty of Paul fans too. As long as the group got the attention, I was happy. Personality? I took part in all the crazy stunts and drinking. I was a Beatle. A rumour around the Cavern was that it was because I turned down Brian Epstein’s advances, but I don’t believe that. Unreliable? I missed four shows in over two years, so if that makes me unreliable... At the end of the day, two people still alive know the reason. We may all read about it in the newspapers next year, or we may never know4.

Nevertheless, there are several strong arguments against Pete’s confusion.

First, concerning the drumming itself, we know absolutely that George Martin was displeased with it, else there would have been no reason for him to make any suggestion of replacing Pete in the studio. John, Paul, and George have all connected the main part of Pete’s dismissal to that which was purely professional, the drumming. In 1974, John unceremoniously remarked, “By then, we were pretty sick of Pete Best too, because he was a lousy drummer, you know? He never improved, and there was always this myth being built up over the years that he was great... We were always going to dump him when we could find a decent drummer”5. Paul’s 2001 comment (on the Wingspan documentary DVD) that Pete was “a really good drummer” does not alter the truth, any more than it changes history. Further, Eric Krasker ascertained, despite Pete’s assertion to the contrary, that, during the Tony Sheridan sessions, Bert Kaempfert expressed reservations concerning (at least) Pete’s bass drum; and that Tony Sheridan, Karl Hinze, and Roy Young have all in some manner or another mentioned Pete’s shortcomings of talent6. But even if it’s absolutely true that Pete was “the No. 1 drummer in Liverpool... constantly talked about everywhere” and “the other drummers all tried to copy”7 his style, the fact is that The Beatles and George Martin were not impressed. As Krasker noted, “Obviously, if Pete had given a fine performance on 6 June 1962, George Martin would have made no negative comment about his drumming, and then it would have been much more difficult for the Beatles to find an objective reason get rid of a skilled drummer. After all, who would have taken the risk of changing a winning team?”6.

Second, although the jealousy towards Pete has probably been overblown, it seems to have contributed to his end. Several anecdotes float that, in the eyes of the other Beatles, Pete received too much female attention, or too high an accolade from a reporter, publicist or fan. But even if there was no jealousy at all, Pete’s popularity might have been an impediment to the ways of John and Paul, whose double-sided leadership could never have been completely turned over to the whim of the public.

Third, personality almost certainly had something to do with it, but probably not with the weight some ascribe. If John was in fact the most acerbic to Pete in years following, it’s interesting that Pete recently said, “John was a dear friend”7. Unless we are entirely cynical, we should probably grant this friendship. Paul was more direct, saying in 2001 (on the Wingspan documentary DVD) that “He wasn't quite like the rest of us. We had kind of a sense of humor in common and he was nearly in with it all. But it's a fine line, you know, as to what is exactly in and what is nearly in.” Ringo, they felt, had a humor and wit that fit them, a rougher image (which they liked), and much more talent as a drummer.

Although one might believe from all the information available that John and Paul were the conspirators against Pete, to hear George Harrison tell it, "I was quite responsible for stirring things up. I conspired to get Ringo in for good; I talked to Paul and John until they came round to the idea." Ringo confirmed that George was “hustling” for him8.

Pete became quite depressed by the news, and many of the female fans took to sleeping outside his window in a vigil for this reason, and to protest the decision. Discord began to shake through audiences wherever The Beatles played without Pete, and some of their fans turned on them in rebellion. At the August 22, 1962 Cavern Club performance, fans brought signs which read “Ringo Never, Pete Best Forever.”

1 The Beatles, p.140

2 Lewisohn, The Beatles Live!, p.99

3 Lewisohn, The Beatles Live!, p.100

4 http://abbeyrd.best.vwh.net/petebest.htm

5 John Lennon – Imagine (1974)

6 http://www.earcandymag.com/ekrasker-0610.htm (Interview with Eric Krasker)

7 http://spicezee.zeenews.com/beatles/story.aspx?id=67889

8 The Beatles Anthology, p.72

(general refs: Rory, Roag and Pete Best, The Beatles: The True Beginnings, pp.166-168; Winn, Way Beyond Compare; Unterberger, The Unreleased Beatles, pp.32-33; Bill Harry, Mersey Beat article: here)

_______________________________________________________________________

RELATIVES: Keep up with Pete Best at the official website: here.

_______________________________________________________________________

Tom Wise
gengar843@msn.com

Although I use quotes from sources, or cited fact, much of the material on this and other pages of my blog is original, from my own pen. This is not cut-and-paste, it is a work of art. Copyright © 2010 Tom Wise.

Lost or Missing Tapes 1957-1962

Documented in various references are tapes that The Beatles or their antecedents made between 1957 and 1962, which may or may not exist in somebody’s desk drawer or vault. Following are ten which may see the light of day in some future utopia (references in parentheses):

(1) Hunter Davies mentioned that in (perhaps Autumn) 1957 Stu Sutcliffe and John Lennon, while at Art College of Liverpool Institute, persuaded a college committee to buy a tape recorder, “ostensibly for use by all students.” This John “borrowed” in order to record and hear how The Quarrymen were doing. Davies claimed that Stu later gave Astrid Kirchherr a reel from these recordings. However, it is now known that Kirchherr received a different reel (1960, April circa). It anyway makes no sense that Stu, having actually joined the band in January 1960, would have given Astrid a recording made without him, especially three years prior. Such tapes are unlikely to exist.

Davies, The Beatles, pp. xlv, 58.

(2) It has been noted that, from perhaps late 1957 into 1958, Geraldine Davies, who lived next door to Colin Hanton, intermittently recorded Quarrymen rehearsals on a Grundig machine. In 1993, Rod Davis borrowed these so-called "Davies/Wong tapes," but found that The Quarrymen recordings had been taped over with other material. It is possible, but unlikely, that a reel escaped notice in some corner.

Harry, The John Lennon Encyclopedia, p.186; Everett, The Beatles as Musicians: The Quarrymen Through Rubber Soul, p.371; Unterberger, The Unreleased Beatles, p.11.

(3) A recording of “Pick a Bale of Cotton” (Leadbelly) was made by Paul McCartney, Neil Harding, and two others during a lunch break at Liverpool Institute, circa late 1958 to early 1959. It is suggested that the tape (aka the “Burfitt tape”) may be in Northern Ireland, where Harding relocated.

Curley, Beatle Pete (2005), p.448; Everett, The Beatles as Musicians: The Quarrymen Through Rubber Soul, p.371.

(4) Several times in 1959, Rory Storm and the Hurricanes (Ringo on drums and vocals; sometimes George Harrison on guitar) were recorded while playing at Liverpool clubs, particularly at the Morgue Cellar. This appears to be the extent of knowledge on these tapes.

Everett, The Beatles as Musicians: The Quarrymen Through Rubber Soul, p.371.

(5) Alan Williams, early booking agent/manager for the lads, recalled a tape he made at the Jacaranda, which in 1960 (perhaps June) he played for Bruno Koschmider in order to book "The Silver Beetles" (and other bands) to the Kaiserkeller Club in Hamburg. Williams described the tape as “an absolute cacophony” and a “sound track for a very poor horror movie.” This tape is thought to exist.

Ryan, John Lennon’s Secret, p.60; Williams, The Man Who Gave the Beatles Away.

(6) On October 15, 1960, The Beatles (with Pete Best) and members of Rory Storm and the Hurricanes (including Ringo) played backup to Lu Walters, singer and bass player for The Hurricanes, for an acetate made in similar fashion to “That’ll Be the Day” (1958, Spring or Summer). This occurred in Hamburg, with Alan Williams in attendance. The songs “Fever” and “Summertime” (and possibly “September Song”) were recorded to the disc. Williams later lost his copy (four are assumed) while en route to present it to Ringo. A photo of this acetate appeared in Williams' book, and a 1963 Mersey Beat article claimed that the recording was popular on the Liverpool underground pop scene. It is likely that a copy of the disc still exists.

Unterberger, The Unreleased Beatles, p.13; Williams, The Man Who Gave the Beatles Away.

PHOTOS & INFORMATION: Lu Walters acetate: here.

(7) Tony Sheridan mentioned, in an interview for the September 6, 1975 issue of New Musical Express, that he believed The Beatles (with or without Sheridan) recorded the songs “Kansas City,” “Rock and Roll Music,” and “Some Other Guy” at the Hamburg sessions (1961, June 22-23). It is doubtful, however, that these still exist (if ever they did), since Gottfriddson did a thorough material search for the CD-set Beatles Bop – Hamburg Days. Nevertheless, hope springs eternal.

Russell, The Beatles on Record, p.5.

(8) A tape from the Summer (likely) of 1962, consisting of eighteen songs performed by The Beatles at the Cavern Club, was purchased by Paul at a Sotheby’s auction on August 29, 1985. No part of this was used for Anthology, so the sonic quality is assumed to be awful. The tape exists, but not for you.

Everett, The Beatles as Musicians: The Quarrymen Through Rubber Soul, p.116.

(9) What we have next is disputed. Reputedly from July 1, 1962 is a tape of Gene Vincent singing “What’d I Say,” with The Beatles backing. Now, both the Beatles and Vincent did play the Cavern Club on this date, and The Beatles did meet Vincent (photos prove it), so most would say, “Why not?” Others have provided good analysis showing the tape to be from another date (perhaps 1965, sans Beatles). This tape circulates (for example, on the bootleg Artifacts II, disc 1), so it’s a cheat for the category at hand. The question is, Does it truly belong in the Beatles canon, except by reputation?

Miles, The Beatles: A Diary, p.48; Everett, The Beatles as Musicians: The Quarrymen Through Rubber Soul, p.371; Unterberger, The Unreleased Beatles, p.44.

PHOTOS & INFORMATION: here.

(10) On November 26, 1962, The Beatles performed in Abbey Road Studios several passes at “Tip of My Tongue.” Though considered for a time as a B-side, the Fabs decided to give this song to Tommy Quickly (also under contract to Brian Epstein). Although documentation so far denies it, a tape of the Beatles performances may still be in EMI vaults.

Lewisohn, Recording Sessions.

_______________________________________________________________________

There are several other known tapes or acetates from this time period which are lost or missing, but they are even less likely to exist (if that's possible).

_______________________________________________________________________

Tom Wise
gengar843@msn.com

Although I use quotes from sources, or cited fact, much of the material on this and other pages of my blog is original, from my own pen. This is not cut-and-paste, it is a work of art. Copyright © 2010 Tom Wise